In the case Trampolin Hills, it is an opportunity to claim, very well founded and with the guarantee of the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court. Acts and claims!
The buyers claim the money in advance either from Caixabank or from other entities where the advances were paid and the courts are giving them the reason.
Trampolín Hills Golf Resort was sold by Antonio Martínez's real estate agency - known in some media as "el melonero" - and which is in bankruptcy, as well as Trampolín Solera, promoter company. In Trampolín Hills the ground never stopped being rustic, because the partial plan never got to be approved and there will be, at least, some 1,500 affected buyers, as we have said before. Having jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, it is fairly simple the return by the bank when it is accredited through an individual court action that they have advanced sums on account of the housing and that this has not been delivered housing The doctrine of the Supreme Court provides that "the obligation that the amounts advanced for the purchase of a home be deposited in a special account is from the developer, not the consumer, and it is the bank or the guarantor entity that must demand that the developer enter the money received in such account and that provides the necessary guarantees or guarantees to guarantee that all the money will be returned to the buyers, plus the legal interest accrued. Due to the lack of diligence of the banking entities, the refund of anticipated amounts is required ". It is an opportunity to claim, very well founded and with the guarantee of the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court. Acts and claims !!!
Trampolín Hills Golf Resort was sold by Antonio Martínez's real estate agency - known in some media as "el melonero" - and which is in bankruptcy, as well as Trampolín Solera, promoter company. In Trampolín Hills the ground never stopped being rustic, because the partial plan never got to be approved and there will be, at least, some 1,500 affected buyers, as we have said before. Having jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, it is fairly simple the return by the bank when it is accredited through an individual court action that they have advanced sums on account of the housing and that this has not been delivered housing The doctrine of the Supreme Court provides that "the obligation that the amounts advanced for the purchase of a home be deposited in a special account is from the developer, not the consumer, and it is the bank or the guarantor entity that must demand that the developer enter the money received in such account and that provides the necessary guarantees or guarantees to guarantee that all the money will be returned to the buyers, plus the legal interest accrued. Due to the lack of diligence of the banking entities, the refund of anticipated amounts is required ". It is an opportunity to claim, very well founded and with the guarantee of the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court. Acts and claims !!!
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario