Afectados Trampolin Hills

The doctrine of the Supreme Court provides that "the obligation that the amounts advanced for the purchase of a home be deposited in a special account is from the developer, not the consumer, and it is the bank or the guarantor entity that must demand that the developer enter the money received in such account and that provides the necessary guarantees or guarantees to guarantee that all the money will be returned to the buyers, plus the legal interest accrued. Due to the lack of diligence of the banking entities, the refund of anticipated amounts is required ". It is an opportunity to claim, very well founded and with the guarantee of the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court.   We are a specialised legal service in Spain that damage individual rights with economic consequences. We are a specialised legal service in Spain that damage individual rights with economic consequences for them. link https://youtu.be/7iAi-jytFrQ ·        We analyse new ...

😊  Breaking News: We recovered 70,000 euros to a family that bought a house with an off-plan property deposit in Yecla (Murcia, Spain)  👩 ⚖️   # offplanclaims   👏 👏 👏 👏 http://ow.ly/OOZt30iWFdc The Court, in the application of Law 57/1968, upheld that the bank, BMN is responsible, together with the property developers, to refund the Off Plan deposits to home buyers for the latter failed to delivered the properties on a timely basis. Did you give advance an account of your future home and it was never delivered to you? Budget without commitment 📧 Mail lexlegis@lexlegis.org We will study your case free of charge http://reclamacionesviviendasnoentregadas.es/ # magdalenaricopalao   # lexlegis   # SentenciasMR Contact us and get your money back.

📌   # Spanish   # Off -plan property  # claims . Did you know that banks are responsible for your deposits?  😎  Spanish law 57/1968 makes Financial Institutions responsible for your off-plan deposits. Recover your money now  👉 💶   ☎  Contact us for more info. WhatsApp +34678203080 E-mail: lexlegis@lexlegis.org

Off-plan deposits. Lex Legis Legal Claims What is needed to claim? We would need cop­ies of your doc­u­ments to study if you have a good case; that is: – pur­chase con­tract – proof of amounts paid by cheque, credit card or bank trans­fers – re­ceipts of pay­ments re­ceived by the prop­erty de­velopers – the ini­tial total price of the prop­erty – the cor­res­pond­ence (if ap­plic­able) between you and the prop­erty de­velopers (and any other writ­ten com­mu­nic­a­tions that may be of use for the case) – any cop­ies of any Court doc­u­ments Hav­ing the con­tracts, cop­ies of all pay­ments, any cor­res­pond­ence is all very im­port­ant. Any legal case needs proof and evid­ence but with this, we may be able to help you sue and re­cover all of your money and in­terest and costs. No Win No Fee We need to re­view in­di­vidual situ­ations but there may be an op­tion of re­cov­er­ing an in­vest­ment by pay­ing the bar­ris­ter fees and Court costs, or on a po...

# Spanish   # Offplan  property  # claims . Did you know that banks are responsible for your deposits? Spanish law 57/1968 makes Financial Institutions responsible for your off-plan deposits. Recover your money now! Contact us for more info. WhatsApp +34607537133 (We speak English) E-mail: lexlegis@lexlegis.org ®LEXLEGIS. Leaders in banking claims • No win, no fee • Get free advice, budget without commitment • No funding • Thousands of people have recovered their money, Join them! # trampolinHills   # santaanadelmonte   # magdalenaricopalao https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iAi-jytFrQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brq07XZ5t-c www.reclamacionesviviendasnoentregadas.es

¿Cómo recuperar el dinero adelantado para comprar una vivienda sobre plano? AFECTADOS TRAMPOLIN HILLS. RECUPERA TU DINERO DEMANDANDO AL BANCO DE LA PROMOTORA  E l Supremo corresponsabiliza al banco de forma solidaria de ese dinero que se entregó y sus intereses correspondientes. La única condición es que se identifique a un banco que diera el crédito promotor para aquella promotora, que casi siempre existe. Son numerosas las sentencias que los Juzgados y Tribunales están dictando en los últimos tiempos, condenando a las entidades bancarias o aseguradoras, al amparo de la Ley 57/68. Si quieres más información nuestro equipo de expertos puede asesorarte, de manera gratuita, buscando la mejor solución para tu caso concreto sin ningún tipo de coste ni compromiso.  Puedes contactarnos en el   teléfono GRATUITO 900 696525 o a  través del telf.. Gratuito 900696525 T. 968793380 Wsap 678203080

La ley 57/1968 es aplicable a los consumidores que entregaron dinero a cuenta y no recibieron su vivienda. Informate pues los Tribunales están dando la razón a los afectados.

AFFECTED BY TRAMPOLIN HILLS IN MURCIA.(English version) We will know the procedures to recover the money anticipated by those affected by the Trampolin Hills Golf Resort case. The Supreme Court consolidates a jurisprudential line oriented to the protection of the home buyer consumer. Information: 34 607 537133 (we speak English) Wsap 34 607537133 Mail lexlegis@lexlegis.org

The doctrine of the Supreme Court provides that "the obligation that the amounts advanced for the purchase of a home be deposited in a special account is from the developer, not the consumer, and it is the bank or the guarantor entity that must demand that the developer enter the money received in such account and that provides the necessary guarantees or guarantees to guarantee that all the money will be returned to the buyers, plus the legal interest accrued. Due to the lack of diligence of the banking entities, the refund of anticipated amounts is required ". It is an opportunity to claim, very well founded and with the guarantee of the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court.   We are a specialised legal service in Spain that damage individual rights with economic consequences. We are a specialised legal service in Spain that damage individual rights with economic consequences for them. link https://youtu.be/7iAi-jytFrQ ·        We analyse new ...

The buyers claim the money in advance either from Caixabank or from other entities where the advances were paid and the courts are giving them the reason.   Trampolín Hills Golf Resort was sold by Antonio Martínez's real estate agency - known in some media as "el melonero" - and which is in bankruptcy, as well as Trampolín Solera, promoter company. In Trampolín Hills the ground never stopped being rustic, because the partial plan never got to be approved and there will be, at least, some 1,500 affected buyers, as we have said before. Having jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, it is fairly simple the return by the bank when it is accredited through an individual court action that they have advanced sums on account of the housing and that this has not been delivered housing The doctrine of the Supreme Court provides that "the obligation that the amounts advanced for the purchase of a home be deposited in a special account is from the developer, not the consum...

Roj:  SAP MU 477/2018  - ECLI:  ES:APMU:2018:477 Id Cendoj:  30030370042018100122 Órgano:  Audiencia Provincial Sede:  Murcia Sección:  4 Fecha:  22/02/2018 No de Recurso:  817/2017 No de Resolución:  123/2018 Procedimiento:  Civil JURISPRUDENCIA Las viviendas tenían que haberse entregado antes de que finalizara el año 2010, pero no sólo no se entregaron sino que tampoco se requirió a los compradores para elevar a públicos los contratos de compraventa, siendo el retraso culpa absoluta de la vendedora. Además Tampolín  Hills  Golf Resort, S.L., se encontraba en situación de Concurso de Acreedores y , a fecha de presentación de la demanda, las obras del complejo apenas habían comenzado. Añadían los demandantes que, al parecer, la promoción carecía de licencia de obras y el dinero destinado a las obras había desaparecido. Se decía en la demanda que la entidad financiera demandada debió exigir la ...

JURISPRUDENCIA Roj:  SAP V 838/2018  - ECLI:  ES:APV:2018:838 Id Cendoj:  46250370082018100070  Órgano:  Audiencia Provincial Sede:  Valencia  Sección:  8 Fecha:  05/03/2018  No de Recurso:  374/2017 No de Resolución:  95/2018  Procedimiento:  Recurso de apelación Ponente:  MARIA CARMEN BRINES TARRASO  Tipo de Resolución:  Sentencia ROLLO No 374/17 SENTENCIA No 000095/2018 SECCIÓN OCTAVA =========================== FUNDAMENTOS DE DERECHO PRIMERO.-  Por D. Simón se formuló en fecha 16 de diciembre de 2.015 demanda contra las entidades  CAIXABANK  S.A. y U.A.B. BTA DRAUDIMA, mediante la que reclamaba el abono de 26.330 € de principal más 10.068,46€ en concepto de intereses generados por la entrega de tal cantidad. Ello como consecuencia de un contrato de adquisición de vivienda sobre plano formalizado por la parte actora con la promotora  Tram...